The claim
In pooled studies, more screen use is associated with slightly weaker child language skills, and the associations are small.
Associative claim. Evidence strength is chosen by the person who posts, based on the sources they read. Never by AI.
The research behind this
1 source, 1 peer reviewed. Evidence rated moderate.
- What the research found, and what it doesn’t say
- The limitations, and what nobody knows yet
- Every source, with a link to the original paper
Evidence Cards are part of Cit.ED Plus. Sign in to open it.
Discussion · 1
Sign in to join the discussion.
Cited by
- Contrasted by · Where I part ways with “read the effect sizes properly”, Dr Amara Okafor · 20 September 2026
Cite, share or tag
Cite the author
A reference to J. Pillay (@jpillay) for this research, as each style cites an online post. A paper in the evidence has its own “Cite this paper”.
Show the reference (APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago, Vancouver)
APA 7th
In-text
Reference list
Harvard
In-text
Reference list
MLA 9th
In-text
Add the page number inside the brackets if you quote, e.g. (Smith 12).
Reference list
Chicago (author-date)
In-text
Reference list
Vancouver
In-text
Vancouver numbers sources in the order you first cite them. Replace 1 with this source’s number.
Reference list
“Copy” gives plain text. “Copy with formatting” keeps the italics when you paste into a document.
Share the post
Tag people
No one is tagged yet. Only the author tags people. To bring someone in, share the post with them.


This should be required viewing before anyone writes a headline.